Please find below a list of our publications:
Consultations
Children’s Social Care, Education Committee Report September 2025 – Together with the Disabled Mothers’ Rights Campaign we gave evidence to Parliament’s Education Committee’s Inquiry into children’s social care in January 2025. ‘Much of the evidence also highlighted the relationship between poverty and neglect, and we heard some concerns about children being taken into care on the grounds of poverty, defined as neglect.‘ [Support Not Separation, Disabled Mothers’ Rights Campaign page 66]
Disabled Children’s Social Care Report September 2025 – In January 2025 SNS and the Disabled Mothers’ Rights Campaign contributed evidence to the Law Commission on disabled children and social services. Our evidence here showed how disabled children are not only more likely to be taken into “care” but that their mothers are targets for parental blame such as Fabricated Induced illness (FII).
Evidence on Expert Witnesses September 2025 – Our evidence to the Family Procedure Rule Committee consultation on the use of expert witnesses in family court says: “Experts are called on in family court to give opinions on Parental Alienation (PA) and on Fabricated Induced Illness (FII).
Evidence to the Public Accounts Committee on Improving family court services for Children September 2025 – “Our evidence on improving family court services for children focuses on the role of Children’s and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS), which is supposed to look after the interests of children whose parents are going through family court proceedings in England.
Human Rights of children in social care in England August 2025 – waiting to publish
Evidence to House of Lords on The Autism Act 2009 June 2025 – We submitted jointly with the Disabled Mothers’ Rights Campaign and had meetings with autistic women whose experience we have included in our evidence. We noticed there was nothing on family courts and social services so we focused our evidence on these topics.
Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill Lords Briefing 1 May 2025 – We are urging politicians to speak out against measures in this Bill aimed at greatly extending state control over children’s and families’ lives – the opposite of protecting children’s wellbeing! It will further undermine children’s right to the love and care of their mother and our right to be together as a family, and to be supported in doing so.
Evidence to Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill February 2025 – We don’t agree with most of the Bill which would extend the corporate parent by bring in more professionals, introduce a “consistent identifier” for all children, and restrict the right to homeschool.
Evidence to the Education Committee February 2024 – Joint submission on Children’s Social Care to Parliament’s Education Committee, by Support Not Separation & Disabled Mothers’ Rights Campaign January 2024.
Evidence to the Sentencing Council December 2023 – We welcome the opportunity to comment on sentencing guidelines for pregnant and post-natal women. We also want to comment on sentencing policy more generally as it relates to women, mothers in particular.
Evidence to Presumption Review Panel about the presumption of contact January 2023 – Among other crucial findings of the Ministry of Justice’s Harm Report (2020), was the extremely negative impact om mothers and children of the “pro-contact” culture which has dominated family court since the “presumption of contact” was introduced into law in 2014.
Evidence to the adoption sub-group December 2023 – sub-group on adoption which was asking for Recommendations for Best Practice in Respect of Adoption. Based on our experience working with hundreds of mothers and children.
Evidence to Family Justice Council: NO to “parental alienation/alienating behaviours” October 2023 – Flying in the face of substantial official international recognition of the illegitimacy of “parental alienation”, it is shocking that the FJC now wants to formalise and legitimise “alienating behaviours” by producing this Guidance. We completely reject this Guidance and urge the FJC to look again at the evidence against “parental alienation” taking into account the body of official evidence.
Evidence to the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women and Girls: Custody cases, violence against women and violence against children January 2023 – In the last 10 years a growing movement of mothers, especially single mothers, struggling to protect our children from abusive fathers has exposed a family court system which backs abusers rather than victims. Male supremacist groups of fathers who deny domestic violence have become embedded in the family court system, using allegations of “parental alienation” to continue their control over women and children. Outrageously, they have had the support of CAFCASS and the president of the family court.
Evidence to the House of Lords Select committee on The Children and Families Act 2014 January 2023 – has the Act improved the situation for vulnerable mothers.
Review of Children’s Social Care – NOT in the “best interest” of children & families August 2022 – Poverty defined as “neglect” and domestic violence are the main reasons for removing children from mothers and families.
Our evidence to forced adoption enquiry October 2021 – Evidence to the Joint Committee on Human Rights: The right to family life: adoption of children of unmarried women 1949-1976
Evidence to the Home Office consultation on the Domestic Abuse Act Statutory Guidance September 2021 – We defend mothers and children against unwarranted separation and the devaluing of the mother-child relationship.
Response to The Case for Change -Independent Review of Children’s Social Care September 2021 – Evidence submitted 13 August 2021 by Legal Action for Women which co-ordinates Support Not Separation, and by the Disabled Mothers’ Rights campaign of WinVisible (women with visible and invisible disabilities).
Committee on Forced Adoption July 2021 – We have written to the Chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights in support of mothers facing forced adoption today whose voices must be heard.
Evidence to Independent Review of Children’s Social Care April 2021 – In January, the government announced what it described as an “independent”, “once-in-a-generation” review of children’s social care. But earlier this month, Article 39, which fights for the rights of children in institutional care, made a detailed analysis of the government contract signed by Josh MacAlister, who was appointed to lead the review.